ENCICLOPÉDIA MINEIRA: Prof. Marcos Tadeu Cardoso
Um projeto do Prof. Marcos Tadeu Cardoso, um livro publicado narrando a história das principais cidades Mineiras.
Entre em contato com o prof. Marcos T. C. pelo e-mail,
marcostcj@yahoo.com.br ou mar.cj@hotmail.com Acesse seu website oficial, http://marcostadeucardoso.blogspot.com
Entre em contato com o prof. Marcos T. C. pelo e-mail,
marcostcj@yahoo.com.br ou mar.cj@hotmail.com Acesse seu website oficial, http://marcostadeucardoso.blogspot.com
Siga-me no twitter: Marcos_Tadeu_C
sábado, 7 de fevereiro de 2015
Continental crust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The thickness of the Earth's crust (km).
The continental crust is the layer of igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks which forms the continents and the areas of shallow seabed close to their shores, known as continental shelves. This layer is sometimes called sial because there is more felsic, or granitic, bulk composition, which lies in contrast to the oceanic crust, called sima because of the mafic or basaltic rock. (Based on the change in velocity of seismic waves, it is believed that at a certain depth sial becomes close in its physical properties to sima. This line is called the Conrad discontinuity.)
Consisting mostly of granitic rock, continental crust has a density of about 2.7 g/cm3 and is less dense than the material of the Earth's mantle (density of about 3.3 g/cm3), which consists of ultramafic rock. Continental crust is also less dense than oceanic crust (density of about 2.9 g/cm3), though it is considerably thicker; mostly 25 to 70 km versus the average oceanic thickness of around 7–10 km. About 40% of the Earth's surface is now overlaid by continental crust.[1] Continental crust makes up about 70% of the volume of Earth's crust.[2]
Contents
1 Importance
2 Origin
3 Forces at work
4 See also
5 Notes
6 References
7 External links
Importance
Because the surface of continental crust mainly lies above sea level, its existence allowed land life to evolve from marine life. Its existence also provides broad expanses of shallow water known as epeiric seas and continental shelves where complex metazoan life could become established during early Paleozoic time, in what is now called the Cambrian explosion.[3]
Origin
There is little evidence of continental crust prior to 3.5 bya, and there was relatively rapid development on shield areas consisting of continental crust between 3.0 and 2.5 bya.[4] All continental crust ultimately derives from the fractional differentiation of oceanic crust over many eons.[4] This process has been and continues today primarily as a result of the volcanism associated with subduction.
Forces at work
In contrast to the persistence of continental crust, the size, shape, and number of continents are constantly changing through geologic time. Different tracts rift apart, collide and recoalesce as part of a grand supercontinent cycle.[5] There are currently about 7 billion cubic kilometers of continental crust, but this quantity varies because of the nature of the forces involved. The relative permanence of continental crust contrasts with the short life of oceanic crust. Because continental crust is less dense than oceanic crust, when active margins of the two meet in subduction zones, the oceanic crust is typically subducted back into the mantle. Continental crust is rarely subducted (this may occur where continental crustal blocks collide and overthicken, causing deep melting under mountain belts such as the Himalayas or the Alps). For this reason the oldest rocks on Earth are within the cratons or cores of the continents, rather than in repeatedly recycled oceanic crust; the oldest intact crustal fragment is the Acasta Gneiss at 4.01 Ga, while the oldest oceanic crust (located on the Pacific Plate offshore of Kamchatka) is no older than Jurassic (~180 Ma). Continental crust and the rock layers that lie on and within it are thus the best archive of Earth history.[1][6]
The height of mountain ranges is usually related to the thickness of crust. This results from the isostasy associated with orogeny (mountain formation). The crust is thickened by the compressive forces related to subduction or continental collision. The buoyancy of the crust forces it upwards, the forces of the collisional stress balanced by gravity and erosion. This forms a keel or mountain root beneath the mountain range, which is where the thickest crust is found.[7] The thinnest continental crust is found in rift zones, where the crust is thinned by detachment faulting and eventually severed, replaced by oceanic crust. The edges of continental fragments formed this way (both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, for example) are termed passive margins.
The high temperatures and pressures at depth, often combined with a long history of complex distortion, cause much of the lower continental crust to be metamorphic - the main exception to this being recent igneous intrusions. Igneous rock may also be "underplated" to the underside of the crust, i.e. adding to the crust by forming a layer immediately beneath it.
Continental crust is produced and (far less often) destroyed mostly by plate tectonic processes, especially at convergent plate boundaries. Additionally, continental crustal material is transferred to oceanic crust by sedimentation. New material can be added to the continents by the partial melting of oceanic crust at subduction zones, causing the lighter material to rise as magma, forming volcanoes. Also, material can be accreted horizontally when volcanic island arcs, seamounts or similar structures collide with the side of the continent as a result of plate tectonic movements. Continental crust is also lost through erosion and sediment subduction, tectonic erosion of forearcs, delamination, and deep subduction of continental crust in collision zones.[8] Many theories of crustal growth are controversial, including rates of crustal growth and recycling, whether the lower crust is recycled differently from the upper crust, and over how much of Earth history plate tectonics has operated and so could be the dominant mode of continental crust formation and destruction.[9]
It is a matter of debate whether the amount of continental crust has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining constant over geological time. One model indicates that at prior to 3.7 Ga ago continental crust constituted less than 10% of the present amount.[10] By 3.0 Ga ago the amount was about 25%, and following a period of rapid crustal evolution it was about 60% of the current amount by 2.6 Ga ago.[11] The growth of continental crust appears to have occurred in spurts of increased activity corresponding to five episodes of increased production through geologic time.[12]
See also
Terrane
Geologic province
Notes
Cogley 1984
Hawkesworth et al. 2010
Ben Waggoner; Allen Collins. "The Cambiran Period". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved 30 November 2013.
Hart, P. J., Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, American Geophysical Union, 1969, pp. 13-15 ISBN 978-0-87590-013-1
Condie 2002
Bowring & Williams 1999
Saal et al. 1998
Clift & Vannuchi 2004
Armstrong 1991
von Huene & Scholl 1991
Taylor & McLennan 1995
Butler 2011, See graphic
References
Armstrong, R.L. (1991). "The Persistent Myth of Crustal Growth". Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 38: 613–630. doi:10.1080/08120099108727995.
Bowring, S A; Williams, I S (1999). "Priscoan (4.00-4.03 Ga) orthogneisses from northwestern Canada". Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (134): 3–16. Bibcode:1999CoMP..134....3B. doi:10.1007/s004100050465.
Butler, Rob (2011). "Making new continents". Retrieved 29 January 2006.
Cogley, J. Graham (1984). "Continental Margins and the Extent and Number of Continents". Reviews of Geophysics 22 (2): 101–122. Bibcode:1984RvGSP..22..101C. doi:10.1029/RG022i002p00101.
Condie, Kent C. (2002). "The supercontinent cycle: are there two patterns of cyclicity?". Journal of African Earth Sciences 35 (2): 179–183. Bibcode:2002JAfES..35..179C. doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(02)00005-2.
Clift, P; Vannuchi, P (2004). "Controls on Tectonic Accretion versus Erosion in Subduction Zones: Implications for the Origin and Recycling of the Continental Crust". Reviews of Geophysics 42 (RG2001). Bibcode:2004RvGeo..42.2001C. doi:10.1029/2003RG000127.
Hawkesworth, C.J.; Dhuime, B.; Pietranik, A.B.; Cawood, P.A.; Kemp, A.I.S.; Storey, C.D. (2010). "The generation and evolution of the continental crust". Journal of the Geological Society (London) 167: 229–248. doi:10.1144/0016-76492009-072.
Saal, A.L.; Rudnick, R.L.; Ravizza, G.E.; Hart, S.R. (1998). "Re–Os isotope evidence for the composition, formation and age of the lower continental crust". Nature 393 (6680): 58–61. Bibcode:1998Natur.393...58S. doi:10.1038/29966.
Walther, John Victor (2005). Essentials Of Geochemistry. Jones & Bartlett. p. 35. ISBN 0-7637-2642-7. (Diagram entitled "Model of growth of continental crust through time" by Taylor, S.R.; McLennan, S.M. (1995). "The geochemical evolution of the continental crust". Rev. Geophys. 33: 241–265. Bibcode:1995RvGeo..33..241T. doi:10.1029/95RG00262.)
von Huene, Roland; Scholl, David W. (1991). "Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, subduction erosion, and the growth of continental crust". Reviews of Geophysics 29: 279–316. Bibcode:1991RvGeo..29..279V. doi:10.1029/91RG00969.
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário